society.īut Asians were an overlooked minority despite a long history of discrimination. in 1968 was a turning point, pushing colleges to redouble their efforts to be more representative of U.S. That debate goes back to the civil rights movement of the 1950s and ‘60s. The court turned away his last major challenge to university admissions, Fisher v. The case has been orchestrated by Edward Blum, a longtime crusader against affirmative action and voting rights laws, and it may yield him a fresh chance to get the issue before the Supreme Court. The lawsuit, brought by an anti-affirmative action group called Students for Fair Admissions, has revived the national debate over race-conscious admissions, which is playing out from colleges down to elementary schools. It includes different viewpoints on issues.” It includes different occupations of parents. That when we talk about diversity of backgrounds and experiences, it includes different academic interests. “We do have some very affirmative goals though that I think are important to understand. “Our goal is not to create a zero-sum game,” Khurana added. “I hope that no student who doesn’t get accepted to Harvard - by the way, I wasn’t accepted to Harvard College out of high school I wouldn’t let me in, even today - what you hope is that people do not read this as if it’s a validation either of who they are nor an invalidation of their potential or their achievement,” said Rakesh Khurana, the dean of Harvard College, who went to Cornell as an undergraduate. It has tapped Jeremy Lin, Malia Obama and Mark Zuckerberg. The system has put brainy future Nobel laureates next to all-star athletes gunning for Wall Street, accomplished musicians and aspiring politicians, the offspring of wealthy alumni and of migrant farmworkers who never got past grade school. From the university’s perspective, those aspects are part of a battle-tested way of building a diverse class of “citizens and citizen-leaders,” as Harvard’s mission statement puts it, who will help shape the future of society. To an outsider, the more obscure aspects of Harvard’s admissions system might seem transactional and filled with whims and preferences that are raising questions both in court and in public debate. Hundreds of admissions documents have been filed in the suit - over the university’s objections that they could reveal trade secrets - and many sections that were previously redacted have been ordered unsealed in recent weeks. This arcane selection process has been illuminated by a lawsuit accusing Harvard of violating federal civil rights law by using racial balancing to shape its admissions in a way that discriminates against Asian-Americans. The officers speak a secret language - of “dockets,” “the lop list,” “tips,” “DE,” the “Z-list” and the “dean’s interest list” - and maintain a culling system in which factors like where applicants are from, whether their parents went to Harvard, how much money they have and how they fit the school’s goals for diversity may be just as important as scoring a perfect 1600 on the SAT. But behind the curtain, Harvard’s much-feared admissions officers have a whole other set of boxes that few ambitious high school students and their parents know about - or could check even if they did.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |